Wednesday, April 29, 2009
Aristotle Greek Tragedy (Journal 5 Oedipus)
Tuesday, April 28, 2009
Greek Tragedy (Journal 4 Repeated Images)
Monday, April 27, 2009
Greek Tragedy Journal 3 (Gender Roles)
Sunday, April 26, 2009
Greek Tragedy (Oedipus Leadership)
In the next reading Oedipus seems to change as a leader and as a person. First his word choice becomes a lot more negative as he addresses the people he formerly trusted. He also seems to only care about himself as Teiresias tells him that he is the problem plaguing the city. Oedipus also turns on his friend Creon; he insults him and then wishes to have him killed because he does not agree with him. A dramatic change in personality and leadership compared to the beginning of the book
Greek Tragedy - Oedipus (was absent when assigned)
Page - 159: King Oedipus wonders why the people of his city have come to him and what may be troubling the city.
Page - 160: A priest comes to Oedipus and tells him about the negative things happening to the city and how all the people in city are being affected.
Page - 161: The priest then goes on to ask Oedipus to help fix the cities problems and return the city to its former greatness.
Page - 162: Oedipus expresses his views on the city and then tells the priest that he has sent Creon to the Oracle in Delphi for guidance.
Page - 163: Creon arrives back to the city from Delphi and brings news about the city from the oracle.
Page - 164: Creon tells Oedipus that the murder of King Laius must be avenged in order to bring back the peace to the city.
Page - 165: Oedipus is shocked by the murder and wonders why the people of city did not pursue the men guilty of the crime.
Page - 166: According to Creon a band of thieves killed Laius and the Sphinx persuaded the people of the city not to venture any further into the murder.
Page - 167: Oedipus vows to find the killer of Laius so the peace in the city can be restored.
Page - 168: The citizens gather around and pray to the Gods for help and assistance.
Page - 169: People continue to pray and reflect upon the negativity in the city.
Page - 170: The people then pray to certain Gods for help.
Literary Devices
Allusion
A Sphinx is a mythological creature. It usually stands guard of something and asks a riddle to adventurers. Using a Sphinx in this story can create the effect of something greater to come since it watches over something prized.
Personification
"And black Death luxuriates in the raw, wailing miseries of Thebes". (37-38) This sentence shows how a dark force took over this town and how it is just festering in it. This creates a problem for the main character.
Motif
Gods were mentioned a lot through out this story. This sets up a certain atmosphere for the story. The people acknowledge that there is a greater force controlling them and this may affect the story.
Metaphor
"Our ship pitches wildly, cannot lift her head/from the depths, the red waves of death..." (29-30) The city is being mirrored to a ship out of control and how it struggles to break free of this evil bond.
Wednesday, April 1, 2009
Dystopian Novel Journal 3 (Brave New World topic B)
Word Count: 262
Sunday, March 29, 2009
Thesis Statements
Analysis Notes and Observations: -The use of soma regularly, citizens of London take soma everyday to go on a holiday and to relieve all of their stress and bad feelings. -How mechanized everything is in the book, from the music to the food. -Technological advancements such as the "Bokanovsky Process", the helicopters, and the feelies. Sex is also emphasized in the book and how everyone is shared.
Significant Literary Questions: -Why does Huxley bring back the drug soma through out the book? -Why does Huxley depict the setting as highly sophisticated, mechanically. -With a large portion of the machines taking over what we would usually do today. - What is Huxley trying to tell us with the technological advancements in this book, how do they affect the people in the book.
Thesis Statement: -Through the extreme use of the drug soma and the advancements in technology, Huxley uses Brave New World as a warning of what our world might become. With this being said we see Huxley's negative out look on technological advancements in the future.
Word Choice
Analysis Notes and Observations: -When describing the story Huxley uses long words. -The dialogue is very short and concise. -Huxley also uses scientific words to describe most things. He talks about people and the social classes honestly. -A lot of describing words. -Repetition of words. -The citizens learn rhymes about soma and other things.
Significant Literary Questions: -Why does Huxley use short words to describe people and long words to describe the setting, and machines? -Why does Huxley not use a lot of literary techniques, besides imagery? -What is the purpose of adding in the rhymes taught through sleep learning?
Thesis Statement: -Huxley's contrasting word choice between dialogue and setting creates a detached sense of life for the technologically advanced citizens of London. -Proving the point that technology does not create community.
Structure
Analysis Notes and Observations: -The story goes chronologically from beginning to end. In the book there is one flashback in which we learn about the Savages life and his mother, Linda. -There are also not a lot of shifts in time and the pace of the book is pretty steady.
Significant Literary Questions: -Why does the author only have one flashback in the book about the Savage? -What is the point of putting the structure chronologically? -Why are there no big jumps in time in the story?
Thesis Statement: -Huxley structured Brave New World chronologically with a steady pace to show how monotonous each passing day is, showing that a society with many restrictions cannot grow or change.
Narrators
Analysis Notes and Observations: -The narration type in this book is third-person omniscient. -We know all of the characters thoughts. -The narrator also focuses on a few main characters (Bernard and the Savage). -We also see the views of Lenina, Helmholtz, and Mustapha Mond, but not in great detail.
Significant Literary Questions: -Why is the narrator all knowing? -Why does the narrator focus on Bernard and the Savage? -What is Huxley trying to prove by focusing just on Bernard and the Savage? -Why did Aldous Huxley incorporate the ideas of Lenina, Helmholtz, and Mustapha Mond in the story?
Thesis Statement: Aldous Huxley narrates the lives of two outcasts from different societies to show how universal acceptance is (in this case nonacceptance). This shows that the fundamentals of two completely different communities are still the same even though they may have grown in opposite directions.